Download this resource
Available in the following formats:
What This Checklist Is
This checklist is a practical self-review tool that helps businesses reflect on how confined space risks are identified and managed at work. It is commonly used during internal reviews, planning activities, or improvement discussions where work involves restricted spaces or limited entry and exit. The checklist is intended for owners, managers, and supervisors who want a clear way to sense-check everyday Work Health and Safety practices.
It is a practical review tool, not a compliance test and not legal advice.
How This Checklist Relates to the Code of Practice
A WHS Code of Practice describes accepted ways of managing Work Health and Safety risks in Australia. This checklist reflects the key themes of the Code by focusing on hazard identification, risk assessment, and risk control for confined spaces. Answering “Yes” and “No” helps highlight where current arrangements manage risks effectively and where gaps or weaknesses may exist.
The checklist supports understanding of good practice without claiming legal alignment.
Why Use a Code of Practice Checklist?
Confined space risks are often severe and can escalate quickly if controls are missing or misunderstood. A checklist like this helps clarify what “good practice” looks like in real work situations, not just in theory. It supports early identification of weak or missing controls and helps set clearer priorities for WHS improvement.
It also supports more informed discussions with workers, advisors, or inspectors about workplace safety.
Key Features
Simple Yes / No checklist format
Written in plain English
Designed for Australian WHS Codes of Practice
Suitable for small and medium businesses
How to Use This Checklist
Work through the questions honestly, based on how confined spaces are actually identified and accessed rather than how they are assumed to be managed. The checklist is most useful when answers reflect real entry conditions, work tasks, and supervision.
Treat “No” answers as areas needing further attention. Use the results to prioritise practical actions and revisit the checklist when work activities, spaces, or risks change.
What Inspectors Commonly Expect to See
Inspectors generally focus on how confined space risks are identified and managed in practice, not just on written procedures. They look for evidence that spaces are recognised as confined, risks are assessed, and controls are in place before work begins. Tools like this checklist support informed decision-making by showing that confined space risks have been actively reviewed.
Action and understanding usually matter more than paperwork alone. Inspectors often want to see that issues identified lead to practical changes.
Notes or action lists from checklist reviews
Changes made to risk controls or work practices
Records showing issues were identified and addressed
FAQs
What is considered a confined space?
A confined space is an enclosed or partially enclosed area with limited entry or exit that may have hazardous conditions. The checklist helps review how these spaces are identified and managed at work.
Is this checklist only for industrial sites?
No. Confined spaces can exist in many workplaces, including maintenance areas, tanks, pits, and some plant or equipment. The checklist is suitable wherever these spaces may be present.
Does completing the checklist make confined space work safe?
No. The checklist helps identify strengths and gaps but does not control risks on its own. It supports review and improvement.
When should confined space risks be reviewed?
Reviews are useful when new spaces are identified, work methods change, or incidents occur. Many businesses also review periodically.
Articles and Further Reading
Regulation s62–s77 – Confined Spaces – Establishes duties for identifying confined spaces, assessing risks, implementing control measures, and ensuring safe entry and work practices.
Regulation s49–s50 – Airborne Contaminants – Sets requirements for managing atmospheric hazards that may arise within confined spaces, including toxic or oxygen-deficient environments.
About the Author
About the Author
Nathan Owen
Nathan has worked in construction for 15 years, primarily in health and safety and site management. He has frontline experience including operating plant and machinery and post-graduate qualifications in health and safety.